Supreme Court to hear plea for review of SC/ST judgment on May 3 | India News
The SC judgment diluting the arrest provision had led to nation-wide agitation by Dalits and tribals leading to lack of a number of lives. In its evaluation petition, the Centre had stated a bench of Justices A Ok Goel and U U Lalit had erred by bearing in mind excessive incidence of acquittals in instances lodged below the Act to reach at a conclusion that arrest provision of the legislation was being misused by means of frivolous complaints.
Showing earlier than a bench headed by Justice Goel, legal professional common Ok Ok Venugopal stated the Centre had filed its written submissions within the case and it was ripe for consideration. The bench agreed for an pressing listening to and posted it for Could three. The AG knowledgeable the court docket that 4 states had individually filed petitions in search of evaluation of the March 20 judgment.
The Centre had stated, “The information and information show weak implementation of the Act. This might not result in dilution of the statutory deterrent punishment to permit accused get bail and terrorise Dalit and tribal victims and witnesses to discourage them from continuing with their complaints towards accused.
“Since offences of atrocities have an effect on dignity and lifetime of members of SC and ST group, FIR must be registered instantly in order that the investigation commences quick with none room for accused to hunt anticipatory bail and that admissible aid as a result of be paid to the sufferer/depending on registration of FIR is given well timed.”
The Centre stated it amended the Act in 2016 to permit compensation ranging between Rs 85,000 and Rs eight.5 lakh to victims of atrocities.
The Centre additionally cited the SC’s 1995 judgment in Ram Kishan Balothia case wherein it had stated, “Trying on the historic background referring to the apply of untouchability and the social angle which result in the fee of such offences towards SCs/STs, there’s a justification of a fear that if good thing about anticipatory bail is made accessible to individuals who’re alleged to have dedicated such offences, there may be each probability of their misusing their liberty whereas on anticipatory bail to terrorise their victims and to forestall correct investigation.”